[Development] Reviews needed before android integration in two weeks

[Thiago Macieira]

On quarta-feira, 6 de fevereiro de 2013 16.45.15, Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt 
wrote:
> On 02/06/2013 04:43 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > Note: a way out is to define *both*.
> 
> This sounds like a logical compromise to me. We can define the
> Q_OS_LINUX_ANDROID and document that it's to avoid breaking existing
> code, and we can use Q_OS_ANDROID internally in Qt.

Please choose one of:

1) deprecate Q_OS_LINUX_ANDROID and document Q_OS_ANDROID as the preferred
2) document both as equivalents, like Q_OS_DARWIN and Q_OS_MAC

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20130206/b05767af/attachment.sig>