[Development] abandoning stale changes on gerrit
Jedrzej Nowacki
jedrzej.nowacki at digia.com
Tue Feb 12 09:19:22 CET 2013
On Friday 1. February 2013 14.34.26 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > But if we automate this the timeout period needs to be long enough.
> > 2-3 months is certainly too short, we need to be conservative with
> > these kinds of automatisms. A year sounds more reasonable.
> >
> >
>
> i don't think this makes sense. i'd rather have a bot post a gentle ping
> after the proposed 3-month timeout, and then follow through within a few
> (four?) weeks.
Hi,
That is a bit destructive. The change would be updated and filters would not
work correctly. It is better to close them immediately, if you really need to.
Cheers,
Jędrek
More information about the Development
mailing list