[Development] abandoning stale changes on gerrit

Jedrzej Nowacki jedrzej.nowacki at digia.com
Tue Feb 12 09:19:22 CET 2013


On Friday 1. February 2013 14.34.26 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > But if we automate this the timeout period needs to be long enough.
> > 2-3 months is certainly too short, we need to be conservative with
> > these kinds of automatisms. A year sounds more reasonable.
> >
> > 
> 
> i don't think this makes sense. i'd rather have a bot post a gentle ping
> after the proposed 3-month timeout, and then follow through within a few
> (four?) weeks.

Hi,

  That is a bit destructive. The change would be updated and filters would not 
work correctly. It is better to close them immediately, if you really need to.

Cheers,

  Jędrek




More information about the Development mailing list