[Development] QtWindowsExtras

Jake Thomas Petroules jake.petroules at petroules.com
Thu Feb 14 22:29:47 CET 2013


Thank you, Lars!

Jake Petroules
Petroules Corporation (www.petroules.com)
Email: jake.petroules at petroules.com
Telephone: +1 (970) 587-3821

On Feb 14, 2013, at 4:16 PM, Knoll Lars <Lars.Knoll at digia.com> wrote:

> Well, I already gave that my approval some days ago in another thread.
> 
> I've now created the repository.
> ssh://codereview.qt-project.org:29418/qt/qtwinextras.git.
> 
> Cheers,
> Lars
> 
> On 2/14/13 9:23 PM, "Jake Thomas Petroules" <jake.petroules at petroules.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> Ah, I see.
>> I've only recently started contributing to the Qt Project so I'm not
>> familiar with everything yet. Sorry about that!
>> 
>> Jake Petroules
>> Petroules Corporation (www.petroules.com <http://www.petroules.com>)
>> Email: jake.petroules at petroules.com
>> Telephone: +1 (970) 587-3821
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Feb 14, 2013, at 3:20 PM, Laszlo Papp <lpapp at kde.org> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Jake Thomas Petroules
>> <jake.petroules at petroules.com> wrote:
>> 
>> I was under the impression we were already waiting for step 4 since there
>> have been a decent number of messages on the mailing list regarding this
>> proposal, and everyone seems to know what the module is for and why we
>> need it. Anyways, is this what you want?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> I was referring to "As we have a QtMacExtras and QtX11Extras, could
>> someone please create a QtWindowsExtras as well?" which did not follow
>> the rules, and that you were asking about repository creation when you
>> did not even get a +1 yet.
>> 
>> 
>> Request for new playground module for Qt
>> Description: a module for Windows-specific helper functions and classes
>> that were removed from Qt 4; this is the Windows counterpart to the
>> already existing qtmacextras and qtx11extras modules.
>> Playground project name: qtwindowsextras (although the guidelines say the
>> name should not include Qt, qtmacextras and qtx11extras do, and I think a
>> similar exception should be made for the Windows library)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> This is not necessary now, and that is why I wrote: in the future.
>> 
>> I hope a maintainer can approve this soon.
>> 
>> Laszlo
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Development mailing list
>> Development at qt-project.org
>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
> 




More information about the Development mailing list