[Development] Qt modules missing mandatory LICENSE files

[Timo Jyrinki]

2013/2/15 Stephen Kelly <stephen.kelly at kdab.com>:
> On Friday, February 15, 2013 12:28:32 Timo Jyrinki wrote:
>> At least qtpim, qtsystems, qtconnectivity, qtfeedback
>> and qtwayland will follow later, and I'll be filing change proposals
>> for them at that time as part of the process.
>
> I don't know why you're packaging those.
>
> You understand that they are not 'part of Qt 5', right?

Mostly Zoltan answered this already, but yes. The packages have
version numbers that make clear they are git snapshots, not releases.
It already seems to me that having them packaged is increasing
interest in the modules, so hopefully this will also help with
development contributions of those modules that people feel important.

2013/2/15 Knoll Lars <Lars.Knoll at digia.com>:
> So I'd like to ask all packagers that package up these to make sure they
> are marked accordingly. These packages are very likely to change in a
> binary incompatible way going forward and no guarantees are given for them.

This is a good idea. I'm adding some extra warnings to the git
snapshot packages.

-Timo