[Development] Preparing Qt 5.0.2 release

Thiago Macieira thiago.macieira at intel.com
Fri Feb 22 17:02:03 CET 2013


On sexta-feira, 22 de fevereiro de 2013 15.43.57, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:36:07PM +0000, Shaw Andy wrote:
> > Now that the merge has done, doesn't this in effect mean that stable
> > is now in reality Qt 5.1.0 based as dev will be merged to stable on
> > 15th March?
> 
> this may very well happen, yes.
> it's still a good idea to push fixes to stable: a) you never know and b)
> distributors may pick them up even if we never make another release of
> the branch.
> conversely, this means that stable is still utterly taboo for features.

Indeed, there's still time to do a 5.0.3 if we wanted to.

Here's a good question: should we tag/branch the stable branch just before the 
dev merge? Otherwise finding those commits later (think one year later) might 
be difficult.

But this is the sign I was waiting for to switch my main development branch 
from stable to dev.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20130222/4c361819/attachment.sig>


More information about the Development mailing list