[Development] Nominating Uli Schlachter (psychon) for Approver

Samuel Rødal samuel.rodal at digia.com
Thu Jan 17 08:05:10 CET 2013


On 01/16/2013 05:47 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quarta-feira, 16 de janeiro de 2013 16.36.01, Robin Burchell wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to nominate Uli (psychon on IRC) for Approver status.
>>
>> Uli has some specialist knowledge that is often hard to find in any
>> appreciable quality: he knows X11. He has helped out quite a bit when
>> asked with reviewing, contributing to, and bouncing ideas off code
>> around the xcb plugin as well as helping figure out bugs elsewhere in
>> the libX11/xcb world that have hit us, from what I've heard.
>>
>> His dashboard can be found at:h
>> ttps://codereview.qt-project.org/#dashboard,1001141
>>
>> Would anyone like to second?
>
> Patches submitted:
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#q,owner:psychon%2540znc.in,n,z
>
> Reviews he's participated in:
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#q,reviewer:psychon%2540znc.in,n,z
>
> I have never heard of Uli's name before and I cannot find any email from him to
> this mailing list. Maybe all of the discussion on XCB was held on IRC and
> there was nothing relevant to post to the rest of us. Also, he has less than
> 50 reviews to his name, including changes that he was CC'ed on but did not
> vote.

Do we have any guidelines on how many reviews and/or contributions 
should precede approver status?

> I'd say that nominating for approver is a bit too early on those two
> conditions. However, I'll lift my concerns if the people working on X11 say
> that his expertise is needed for the continued progress of the codebase.

He's definitely provided a lot of valuable input around the xcb platform 
plugin, so I for one would certainly trust him to approve changes in 
that area.

+1 from me.

--
Samuel




More information about the Development mailing list