[Development] Moc with clang.
mingw.android at gmail.com
Wed Jul 3 13:53:46 CEST 2013
If a project releases binary packages for a given OS, but they aren't able
to make binaries for the latest version and if the latest release for that
OS is marked experimental, then that fits my definition of "not mature".
Also, not having 64bit doesn't point to much maturity (nor does forcing
fixed installation paths on any system - last time I checked clang was like
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Laszlo Papp <lpapp at kde.org> wrote:
> It is really strange then they do not provide "mature" installers for the
> mature parts.
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Tr3wory <tr3w at freemail.hu> wrote:
>> Maturity of clang on windows is a little complicated:
>> First you can use 2 ABI: gcc/mingw or msvc.
>> As far as I know the first is kind of working while the second has
>> serious issues.
>> Also the libc++ std library implementation has issues on windows,
>> while the libstdc++ (from mingw 4.8) works.
>> But this is about the clang used as a full compiler.
>> If you use only the libclang as a c++ parser, then it's as good as
>> everywhere else. And the moc-ng used as a drop in replacement of moc
>> use only this. (Using as a clang plugin is a different story.)
>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Laszlo Papp <lpapp at kde.org> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Konstantin Tokarev <annulen at yandex.ru>
>> > wrote:
>> >> > So, it could not be even optional because clang is not mature enough
>> >> > Windows, and in other scenarios or there is any other reason?
>> >> Clang is quite mature on Windows, at least when used as C++ parser.
>> > Why I thought that was because I do not see pre-built Windows clang
>> > for the latest version, and even before that, it had been marked as
>> > "Experimental". Not sure about 64 bit, debug, openmp (few projects
>> still use
>> > that, yeah), other scenarios, et cetera.
>> > Perhaps, if you build it yourself, it might work, but still. :-)
>> > Cheers,
>> > Laszlo
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Development mailing list
>> > Development at qt-project.org
>> > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>> Development mailing list
>> Development at qt-project.org
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Development