[Development] Differences: QDesktopServices vs QStandardPaths
David Faure
faure at kde.org
Wed Jul 10 10:11:48 CEST 2013
Le mercredi 10 juillet 2013 09:41:59 Mark a écrit :
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Chris W
>
> <chrisw.qtdevel at psychogeeks.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Were the following differences between the paths returned by Qt 4.8
> > QDesktopServices and 5.1 QStandardPaths intentional or bug-worthy? (They
> > are annoying either way)
The removal of "data/" was intentional, because it prevented accessing other
things under local/share. It was a hardcoded subdir that had no reason to be
there (check local/share, the xdg standard is to put stuff directly in there,
not in a data subdir).
However I didn't anticipate the migration problem, indeed.
At this point changing the behavior of QStandardPaths::DataLocation would
surely create even more trouble, so instead I can offer a
QStandardPaths::Qt4DataLocation which would have the "data", for easier
migration from Qt4. How does this sound?
> > #if QT_VERSION >= QT_VERSION_CHECK(5,0,0)
> > QStringList paths =
> > QStandardPaths::standardLocations(QStandardPaths::DataLocation);
writableLocation() is a more direct equivalent of
QDesktopServices::storageLocation btw.
> > #else
> > QString paths =
> > QDesktopServices::storageLocation(QDesktopServices::DataLocation);
Mark wrote:
> Since you haven't received a single reply yet, adding David Faure (the
> author of this class) in the CC.
Yes, thanks. I get too much email to be able to monitor the development at qt
list :(
> I recommend making a bug report: bugreports.qt-project.org
Yes.
--
David Faure, faure at kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr
Working on KDE, in particular KDE Frameworks 5
More information about the Development
mailing list