[Development] Clarification on Mac 10.6 support for Qt 5.2

Thiago Macieira thiago.macieira at intel.com
Thu Jun 6 17:15:47 CEST 2013

On quinta-feira, 6 de junho de 2013 11.22.28, Koehne Kai wrote:
> > That means we need to change the Qt 5.1 RC1 build scripts to pass
> > -no-c++11.
> Isn't the lower risk approach to just revert the change in the release
> branch? That is, we'd have the same behavior as with 5.0. I understand that
> passing -no-c++11 explicitly would be more invasive.

To be honest, it might be. Liang found an issue yesterday when compiling 
QtLocation, since it has a .pro file with CONFIG -= qt.

The problem is that the revert needs investigation. I'm not sure that 
reverting this commit alone is enough or won't break other things out there.

Passing -no-c++11 should be easy. But it doesn't fix Liang's problem.

Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20130606/404675b6/attachment.sig>

More information about the Development mailing list