[Development] Maintainership of QtNetwork
olivier at woboq.com
Tue Nov 5 23:27:22 CET 2013
On Monday 04 November 2013 11:55:49 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On segunda-feira, 4 de novembro de 2013 18:21:38, Knoll Lars wrote:
> > I¹m also happy that Peter and Rich are stepping up to take over the
> > maintainership. A shared maintainership is something we didn¹t have
> > before, but I¹m happy to try it out. IMO it¹ll work fine, as long as Peter
> > and Rich agree between themselves.
> That's what the QtSerialPort guys have been doing, but we did run into
> trouble there.
> I would prefer if the two came into an agreement who would take the burden
> of tie-breaking and making final decisions.
It was different poeple, and a different module.
I trust Rich and Peter to be able to come to agreements.
I am supporting their proposal.
Woboq - Qt services and support - http://woboq.com
P.S.: In the hypothetic case in which they would disagree, even if one of them
is chosen maintainer now, the fact that he might impose its view on that
ground would be what I consider an injustice. (Since they both are active.)
I beleive the proper way to solve conflict is to ask a third party, not
More information about the Development