[Development] New Qt 5.2 snapshot build #172

[Jake Petroules]

On Nov 26, 2013, at 10:22 AM, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira at intel.com> wrote:

> On terça-feira, 26 de novembro de 2013 14:55:52, Koehne Kai wrote:
>>> FYI, installer font is still messed up on OSX 10.9. I have tried to find
>>> the original bug report but only found QT 4.8.x reports marked fixed:
>>> https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-33049
>>> https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-32789
>>> https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-31803
>> 
>> Well, they're fixed for Qt 4.8.6, which isn't released yet. Not sure we
>> should start cherry-picking because of it... The bug reports sound like
>> it's just a minor ugliness (though I haven't seen it live yet).
> 
> This is the first thing users see. It will detract from the perception of Qt's 
> quality. And it's not like we didn't know about this -- we just failed to put 
> two and two together.

I completely agree; this should be fixed for the 5.2 final.

> 
> How difficult is it to cherry-pick the fixes into the installer framework build?
> 

It's just one patch. Alternatively, use QFont::insertSubstitution(".Lucida Grande UI", "Lucida Grande") for these builds of QIF when running on OS X >= 10.9 if that's simpler.

> -- 
> Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
>  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

-- 
Jake Petroules
Chief Technology Officer
Petroules Corporation · www.petroules.com
Email: jake.petroules at petroules.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20131126/46251b4a/attachment.html>