[Development] Cherry picking to replace a change set

Thiago Macieira thiago.macieira at intel.com
Tue Sep 3 18:30:51 CEST 2013


On terça-feira, 3 de setembro de 2013 11:42:04, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> you did, however, make no effort to substantiate your position.
> an argument against your interpretation is for example bisectability.
> also, it's just plain illogical to tear apart an allegedly "too complex"
> change, because then assessing the pieces requires adding "external"
> context. which is just a less handy way to review one big change.

I've made it clear that I prefer reviewability (now and in the future) over 
compilability, in extreme cases.

It's an opinion. As such, it does not have to be substantiated.
-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20130903/fb88a118/attachment.sig>


More information about the Development mailing list