[Development] Changelogs for 5.3.0

[Bache-Wiig Jens]

I edited and updated the controls related change log here:

https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,84066

On a somewhat related note, I would suggest that for future updates we
standardize on putting the bug-id after each item entry rather than in front
as that would make the document a bit more readable in my opinion.
I don’t really see any valid reason why people would remember a specific
task number and scan that list manually.

Jens

On 24 Apr 2014, at 06:57, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira at intel.com<mailto:thiago.macieira at intel.com>> wrote:

Em qua 23 abr 2014, às 21:22:40, Alan Alpert escreveu:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Thiago Macieira

<thiago.macieira at intel.com<mailto:thiago.macieira at intel.com>> wrote:
Please find attached the raw logs for each of the modules that had any
[ChangeLog] in the v5.2.1..origin/release range.

I'm taking responsibility of editing the one for qtbase.

For all other modules, I'd like someone to reply to this email saying
they'll be the editor. Otherwise, there will be no changelog for the
module at all, because I won't do it.

I'll edit qtquick1. First draft at
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,83982 (and it's just one
item... probably ready to go).

Also qtdeclarative, which I didn't see in the attachments, but running
the script and adding the output to the existing changelog gives
another 'first' draft: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,83983

Comments there.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com<http://intel.com>
 Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development at qt-project.org<mailto:Development at qt-project.org>
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20140424/e244e50c/attachment.html>