[Development] Question about Qt's future

[Hausmann Simon]

Hmm, but why don't you use Qml like that then? The language doesn't force you to use inline js code, does it?

A lot of the work that has gone into the engine lately also enables this to work better and reduce the use of JS. For example bindings that just consist of a qsTr don't actually end up creating any js bindings.

Simon

  Opprinnelig melding
Fra: Yves Bailly
Sendt: 16:52 søndag 27. april 2014
Til: development at qt-project.org
Emne: Re: [Development] Question about Qt's future


On 27/04/2014 12:55, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Having imperative code on the JS side is also the root of the rejection of QML
> for many C++ developers. If QML would have been just a improved .ui nobody would
> have complained.

+1


--
(o< | Yves Bailly                          | -o)
//\ | Linux Dijon  : http://www.coagul.org | //\
\_/ |                                      | \_/`
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development at qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development