[Development] Question about Qt's future

[Thiago Macieira]

Em dom 27 abr 2014, às 12:55:58, Peter Kümmel escreveu:
> Having imperative code on the JS side is also the root of the rejection of
> QML for many C++ developers. If QML would have been just a improved .ui
> nobody would have complained.

We'd end up with one of the problems of CSS which is that you can't do 
calculations in the bindings. I can't do

	width: 50% - 10em

The moment you start adding some math, you need stuff like Math.random() and 
you end up again in JS.
-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center