[Development] Question about Qt's future

[André Pönitz]

On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 01:37:33PM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Em dom 27 abr 2014, às 12:55:58, Peter Kümmel escreveu:
> > Having imperative code on the JS side is also the root of the rejection of
> > QML for many C++ developers. If QML would have been just a improved .ui
> > nobody would have complained.
> 
> We'd end up with one of the problems of CSS which is that you can't do 
> calculations in the bindings. I can't do
> 
> 	width: 50% - 10em
> 
> The moment you start adding some math, you need stuff like Math.random() and 
> you end up again in JS.

Not true. Some (basic) math fits the "declarative" needs, and would
be toolable. Math.random() does obviously not fit the bill.

Andre'