[Development] Qt 4.x and Qt 5 frameworks should use @rpath (QTBUG-31814)
Ziller Eike
Eike.Ziller at digia.com
Wed Aug 13 08:36:20 CEST 2014
On Aug 12, 2014, at 1:37 PM, Adam Strzelecki <ono at java.pl> wrote:
>> On to my now standard question: Can you summarize the discussion so far into a proposal on what you want to change? Keep it as short as possible :) For example, I think it’s understood that (incremental) framework coping is fast - no need to go into details. On the other hand I think it’s important to make clear which parts of the current workflow we will leave behind.
>
> Well, in fact. It is me who has proposed changes and pushing them to Gerrit. Jake is my advocate here ;)
>
> Please see post that summarized what we want (as you have previously requested, but probably was lost in numerous other posts):
>
> http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2014-August/017867.html
>
> FYI there are 3 new changes for 5.4 (instead for dev, requested by Oswald Buddenhagen):
>
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/92071
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/92072
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/92073
>
I don’t see a change to macdeployqt here, but I suppose there should be one?
Br, Eike
--
Eike Ziller, Senior Software Engineer - Digia, Qt
Digia Germany GmbH, Rudower Chaussee 13, D-12489 Berlin
Geschäftsführer: Mika Pälsi, Juha Varelius, Tuula Haataja
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin, Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 144331 B
More information about the Development
mailing list