[Development] Qt 4.x and Qt 5 frameworks should use @rpath (QTBUG-31814)

Ziller Eike Eike.Ziller at digia.com
Wed Aug 13 08:36:20 CEST 2014


On Aug 12, 2014, at 1:37 PM, Adam Strzelecki <ono at java.pl> wrote:

>> On to my now standard question: Can you summarize the discussion so far into a proposal on what you want to change? Keep it as short as possible :) For example, I think it’s understood that (incremental) framework coping is fast - no need to go into details. On the other hand I think it’s important to make clear which parts of the current workflow we will leave behind.
> 
> Well, in fact. It is me who has proposed changes and pushing them to Gerrit. Jake is my advocate here ;)
> 
> Please see post that summarized what we want (as you have previously requested, but probably was lost in numerous other posts):
> 
> 	http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2014-August/017867.html
> 
> FYI there are 3 new changes for 5.4 (instead for dev, requested by Oswald Buddenhagen):
> 
> 	https://codereview.qt-project.org/92071
> 	https://codereview.qt-project.org/92072
> 	https://codereview.qt-project.org/92073
> 

I don’t see a change to macdeployqt here, but I suppose there should be one?

Br, Eike

-- 
Eike Ziller, Senior Software Engineer - Digia, Qt
 
Digia Germany GmbH, Rudower Chaussee 13, D-12489 Berlin
Geschäftsführer: Mika Pälsi, Juha Varelius, Tuula Haataja
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin, Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 144331 B




More information about the Development mailing list