[Development] Adding LGPLv3 to Qt
Florian Weimer
fweimer at redhat.com
Wed Aug 20 11:35:16 CEST 2014
On 08/20/2014 11:30 AM, Knoll Lars wrote:
> On 20/08/14 11:16, "Florian Weimer" <fweimer at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On 08/20/2014 11:02 AM, Knoll Lars wrote:
>>
>>> Please have a look at
>>> http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2014/08/20/adding-lgpl-v3-to-qt/ for
>>> details.
>>
>> Looking at the Fedora corpus, there are quite a few programs which link
>> against Qt and which are licensed under the GPL, version 2, but not any
>> later versions. If Qt gradually moves new components to the LGPLv3,
>> this could threaten the future evolution of these programs.
>
> This is not a problem as far as I can see for two reasons:
>
> 1. We don’t remove LGPLv2 for any of the libraries that are part of 5.3.
What I meant that future development of these programmers might be
interesting in LGPLv3-only features.
> 2. We explicitly added GPLv2 to the new libraries to make sure open source
> projects that are using GPLv2 only do not have issues using the new
> libraries.
This is not mentioned in the blog post AFAICT. It would address the
concerns I have raised.
--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security
More information about the Development
mailing list