[Development] Coding style proposal

[Knoll Lars]

On 02.01.14 08:42, "Simon Hausmann" <simon.hausmann at digia.com> wrote:

>On Thursday 2. January 2014 09.34.21 Konstantin Ritt wrote:
>> 1. In cpp, we typically use enums for numeric constants. In Qt coding
>> style, enums are in CamelCase.
>> 2. Just a wasting of time. Simply use generated documentation rather
>>than
>> scroll over the header files (Qt docs are very good, you know).
>
>I also think that it's going to be difficult to get buy-in for moving
>functions 
>around. I think it adds little value (in the light of IDE based
>navigation) 
>and lots of noise in the git history.

And reordering virtual functions would break BC.

Lars