[Development] Request for a sandbox area: Replicant

md at rpzdesign.com md at rpzdesign.com
Mon Jun 2 01:55:49 CEST 2014

This cross process stuff is starting to feel like 1996 and
remote procedure RPC calls, now using QT signals and slots. "<drool>"
again for effect.

One could review the history of microsoft and the fine RPC mechanisms
that turned out to be mostly unusable, or maybe just unused.

Keep the optimism in check folks. We have a lot of devices now in the
mix, not just Win32.


On 6/1/2014 6:50 PM, Stottlemyer, Brett (B.S.) wrote:
>> I am *HUGELY* interested in this.  We do lots of IPC, and across physical devices, 
>> and his design issues really "hit home" for us.  Part of the reason for our interest 
>> is we've implemented similar things, and the "design-approach-overlap" is 
>> uncanny.  (That's a CAN bus joke.)
>> This is "plumbing".  It should be in a library.  Sitting on top of Qt. Providing 
>> simple type-safe cross-process messaging.
>> Signals/slots transparent across processes... <drool>...
>> --charley
> \o/
> Thanks, Charley!  No pressure, though, right?
> Brett
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

More information about the Development mailing list