[Development] Proposal: All Qt modules must use the same version number
stephen.kelly at kdab.com
Fri Jun 27 10:57:14 CEST 2014
On Thursday, June 26, 2014 08:38:01 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Em qui 26 jun 2014, às 09:52:20, Stephen Kelly escreveu:
> > > > > > Therefore
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > major version must stay the same until Qt 6.
> > > > >
> > > > > Why is it not acceptable?
> > > >
> > > > Because Lars did not accept it.
> > >
> > > Well, the solution is that you can rename the module altogether.
> > >
> > > Quick 1 and Quick 2.
> > That includes the requirement to namespace or rename all symbols,
> > executables, libraries and environment variables. We talked about this at
> > QtCS. It was not accepted as a solution. Now see the use of 'accept.*'
> > above.
> I guess this is a subject for when and if the situation happens again.
Make that suggestion next time too.
The enginio situation happened because it was not actually discussed.
Join us at Qt Developer Days 2014 in Berlin! - https://devdays.kdab.com
Stephen Kelly <stephen.kelly at kdab.com> | Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company
www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090
KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions
More information about the Development