[Development] QSettings refactor updates
thiago.macieira at intel.com
Mon Oct 13 14:41:08 CEST 2014
On Monday 13 October 2014 13:47:44 André Somers wrote:
> Thiago Macieira schreef op 11-10-2014 10:25:
> > On Friday 10 October 2014 21:27:58 Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
> >> I tougth about having a changed() signal on the QConfig / QConfigGroup
> >> classes, is the QConfigWatcher a better approach?
> > Put it in a separate class. QConfig (Group) should not be a QObject.
> Why not?
QConfigGroup definitely cannot be a QObject. QObjects can't be copied, so we
can't do the value semantics we asked for. Those are conflicting design
Make it like the QDBusPendingReply + QDBusPendingCallWatcher or QFuture +
QFutureWatcher pairs. We have the precedent there.
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
More information about the Development