[Development] Qdoc || !Qdoc

[Smith Martin]

?You can use either doxygen or qdoc, but the two have different command sets, so they aren's interchangeable.


If you want your documentation to link to the Qt documentation, it might be easier to use qdoc. I'm not sure that's correct, because I haven't actually used doxygen for that purpose, but I know you can link to Qt documentation using qdoc.


martin

________________________________
From: development-bounces+martin.smith=theqtcompany.com at qt-project.org <development-bounces+martin.smith=theqtcompany.com at qt-project.org> on behalf of Federico Buti <bacarozzo at gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 11:36 AM
To: Shivashankar Venugopal
Cc: development at qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] Qdoc || !Qdoc

?Thanks for the fast response! I'm going to have a look to the documentation.
Just to be totally sure: your answer implies that, as an external user of Qt (not a developer), it is now advisable to switch from Doxygen to qdoc, right? Or using qdoc is only suggested for Qt APIs?
Thanks again,
F.

?---?

On 21 October 2014 11:23, Shivashankar Venugopal <Venugopal.Shivashankar at theqtcompany.com<mailto:Venugopal.Shivashankar at theqtcompany.com>> wrote:
Hi,

qdoc3 is renamed as qdoc since Qt 5.0. You should find all the details you need about qdoc on http://doc-snapshot.qt-project.org/qdoc/qdoc-index.html. Find us on the #qt-documentation channel on freenode if you have any questions.

Venu
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development at qt-project.org<mailto:Development at qt-project.org>
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20141021/9b649ebe/attachment.html>