[Development] Are SiCs through #include cleanups considered acceptable?
Marc Mutz
marc.mutz at kdab.com
Thu Apr 9 14:20:40 CEST 2015
On Thursday 09 April 2015 13:04:21 André Somers wrote:
> I think it is reasonable to remove such indirect includes if they are
> not needed for Qt itself. However, it is worth looking into how the
> thing was documented to begin with. In the case of qHash(), the
> documentation for that one actualy says the include is <QHash>. I think
> it is not reasonable to break that.
I agree, and therefore the change(s) in question does't/don't.
--
Marc Mutz <marc.mutz at kdab.com> | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company
Tel: +49-30-521325470
KDAB - The Qt Experts
More information about the Development
mailing list