[Development] RFC: more liberal 'auto' rules?

Thiago Macieira thiago.macieira at intel.com
Fri Dec 4 02:56:11 CET 2015

On Thursday 03 December 2015 14:14:19 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> That depends on how big the remainder is. I argue that we're relevant
> enough  that our own direction is big enough to be of relevance.

That didn't come out right. Rephrasing:

Qt has enough market share by itself that we can choose our own direction and 
still be relevant. We are allowed to disagree with what others do.

> For example, we don't use exceptions and underscores.

Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

More information about the Development mailing list