[Development] RFC: more liberal 'auto' rules?
Thiago Macieira
thiago.macieira at intel.com
Fri Dec 4 02:56:11 CET 2015
On Thursday 03 December 2015 14:14:19 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> That depends on how big the remainder is. I argue that we're relevant
> enough that our own direction is big enough to be of relevance.
That didn't come out right. Rephrasing:
Qt has enough market share by itself that we can choose our own direction and
still be relevant. We are allowed to disagree with what others do.
> For example, we don't use exceptions and underscores.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
More information about the Development
mailing list