[Development] Please do not remove QtWebkit from 5.6 official binaries

Mark De Wit mark.dewit at iesve.com
Fri Dec 4 09:10:08 CET 2015


Hmm, interesting, I wasn't aware of that location.  However, I don't think those flags are right, hasn't OpenGL switched to be Dynamic instead of Desktop, for instance?

Having looked around further, I'm liking the look of this:

http://code.qt.io/cgit/qtsdk/qtsdk.git/tree/packaging-tools/releases

Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: Development [mailto:development-bounces at qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Alejandro Exojo
Sent: 03 December 2015 19:08
To: development at qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] Please do not remove QtWebkit from 5.6 official binaries

El Thursday 03 December 2015, Mark De Wit escribió:
> Building from source would be an option, I guess.  We have done it in 
> the past, but the build process / flags (for distribution) is not 
> sufficiently well documented, and starting with 5.5.1 we were excited 
> to be able to use official binaries.

When reproducing a build, I always start with the flags in this repository:

http://code.qt.io/cgit/qtsdk/qtsdk.git/tree/packaging-tools/bld_config

--
Alex (a.k.a. suy) | GPG ID 0x0B8B0BC2
http://barnacity.net/ | http://disperso.net _______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development at qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development



More information about the Development mailing list