[Development] RFC: more liberal 'auto' rules?

Marc Mutz marc.mutz at kdab.com
Fri Dec 4 10:22:35 CET 2015

On Friday 04 December 2015 08:35:05 Randall O'Reilly wrote:
> So anyway, this is just a vote to keep with the solid tradition of favoring
> simplicity, clarity, usability, readability, etc, instead of just
> following the std:: C++ crowd!  Without Qt, I would have to suck it up and
> rewrite everything in Go or Python or something.. :)

You should be monitoring the community you are so quick to judge. Google GSL. 
Just because something has been done that way for decades doesn't mean it's 
best, for any definiton of the word.

Marc Mutz <marc.mutz at kdab.com> | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company
Tel: +49-30-521325470
KDAB - The Qt Experts

More information about the Development mailing list