[Development] RFC: more liberal 'auto' rules?

Marc Mutz marc.mutz at kdab.com
Fri Dec 4 22:29:09 CET 2015

On Friday 04 December 2015 19:06:51 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> it's not that anyone is confused, it's that your "aside" was inherently
> flawed: variables in python are dynamically typed, so the suggestion
> that they are "auto" in any way related to c++ makes no sense
> whatsoever. my response aimed merely at showing that even your little
> "joke" was off.

Again: I was referring to the omission of any form of type name when declaring 
variables. That Python is _also_ dynamically typed is correct, but irrelevant. 
If you have a problem distinguishing these two orthogonal issues, s/Python/C#/


Marc Mutz <marc.mutz at kdab.com> | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company
Tel: +49-30-521325470
KDAB - The Qt Experts

More information about the Development mailing list