[Development] RFC: more liberal 'auto' rules?
Mathias Hasselmann
mathias at taschenorakel.de
Mon Dec 7 14:39:37 CET 2015
Am 07.12.2015 um 15:39 schrieb Marc Mutz:
> - auto everywhere in C++ means that the type of the rhs defines the type of the
> variable
To the extreme of having:
auto x = Type { init };
Instead of:
Type x(init);
...if you follow Herb Sutter to the extreme[1]. It feels quite extreme
in the first moment, but undeniable has some inner logic if you read
that article to the end. I am undecided by myself still since that
proposal is that extreme. Well, but this could just mean I am getting
old and inflexible.
[1]:
http://herbsutter.com/2013/08/12/gotw-94-solution-aaa-style-almost-always-auto/
More information about the Development
mailing list