[Development] RFC: more liberal 'auto' rules?

[Thiago Macieira]

On Monday 07 December 2015 17:50:41 Marc Mutz wrote:
> [1] Before you flame again: Independant of the exit strategy, it should be 
> consensus that the *name* QList will only exist as a porting vehicle 
> (deprecated class or deprecated template alias or something entirely 
> different). Whether the actual implementation lives on as QArrayList (say)
> is  orthogonal to that.

Yes, we are in agreement. There will be a "QList" in Qt 6, but not with its 
current memory layout. How we'll implement it, that's a discussion for another 
day.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center