[Development] RFC: more liberal 'auto' rules?
Marc Mutz
marc.mutz at kdab.com
Wed Dec 9 16:32:34 CET 2015
On Wednesday 09 December 2015 14:15:47 Bubke Marco wrote:
> for (auto &&value : values)
This is ok in generic code.
In non-generic code, I think it's too clever.
In general, I would always try to preserve which kind of type we're dealing
with:
const auto *e =
auto e* =
const auto &e =
auto &e =
auto e =
const auto e =
But that's just the level of auto that _I_ feel comfortable with. YMMV.
Thanks,
Marc
--
Marc Mutz <marc.mutz at kdab.com> | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company
Tel: +49-30-521325470
KDAB - The Qt Experts
More information about the Development
mailing list