[Development] RFC: more liberal 'auto' rules?

Sergio Martins sergio.martins at kdab.com
Tue Dec 22 15:06:36 CET 2015

On Tuesday, 22 December 2015 15:06:34 WET Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
> 22.12.2015, 14:50, "Bubke Marco" <Marco.Bubke at theqtcompany.com>:
> > Clazy is nice but it's under GPL so it's not possible to integrate it in
> > the creator clang code model. But I think we need something like clazy
> > for the clang code model too.
> I see at least 2 options how to integrate clazy:
> 1. Include it as a separate GPL-only plugin, users of commercial edition
> will be able to install it separately. If that's too cumbersome to separate
> this checks from code model, guard them with ifdefs so Clang plugin could
> be compiled as GPL or as LGPL
> 2. Just use it as external tool and parse its output.

3. Change clazy's license to LGPL

SĂ©rgio Martins | sergio.martins at kdab.com | Software Engineer
Klarälvdalens Datakonsult AB, a KDAB Group company
Tel: Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090, USA +1-866-777-KDAB(5322)
KDAB - The Qt Experts

More information about the Development mailing list