[Development] RFC: more liberal 'auto' rules?

Matthew Woehlke mwoehlke.floss at gmail.com
Tue Dec 22 15:40:01 CET 2015

On 2015-12-22 09:50, Marc Mutz wrote:
>     foreach(const QString &s : someLongExpression()->fooBar().names())
>     const auto strings = someLongExpression()->fooBar().names();
>     for (const QString &s : strings)

On that note, is there any case in which Q_FOREACH is superior to a
range-based for? (Besides the obvious one where the original list is
modified from within the loop?)


More information about the Development mailing list