[Development] Doubts on license headers and correct people to add for a change in qtdeclarative
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
perezmeyer at gmail.com
Sat Feb 7 03:48:59 CET 2015
Hi! I've pushed a change to qtdeclarative [0] and I have two doubts:
- Who exactly should I add to review it? git blames Lars in lots of places but
I'm not really sure.
- What's the custom with respect to copyright headers? I've added a simple
test and normally all of them have a license header on them. Should I add one?
Should I list myself?
[0] <https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/105650/>
Thanks in advance, Lisandro.
--
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20150206/51f03cbc/attachment.sig>
More information about the Development
mailing list