[Development] Reproducible Qt ; the purpose of QLibraryInfo::buildDate
Alejandro Exojo
suy at badopi.org
Sun Feb 15 16:24:08 CET 2015
El Thursday 05 February 2015, Thiago Macieira escribió:
> On Thursday 05 February 2015 11:07:29 Koehne Kai wrote:
> > It's not used anymore in the evaluation process, AFAICT. I wouldn't mind
> > deprecating it ...
>
> Then change it to 2012-12-20.
Isn't this just breaking the function, and marking it as deprecated an excuse
for breaking it with less guilt?
People might rely on the function in proprietary applications in ways that are
impossible to predict.
Making the Qt builds reproducible should still be possible by faking the date
of the build, isn't it?
--
Alex (a.k.a. suy) | GPG ID 0x0B8B0BC2
http://barnacity.net/ | http://disperso.net
More information about the Development
mailing list