[Development] Code Coverage Statistics for QtBase

S├ębastien Fricker fricker at froglogic.com
Thu Feb 19 20:46:27 CET 2015


On 19/02/2015 17:31, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Thursday 19 February 2015 15:57:30 Paeglis Gatis wrote:
>>> Why can they be ignored?
>> I mean, we use only some of the API from that library, but bundle all of it.
>> If it is not fully covered by tests it is not an issue.
> It's also possible that Froglogic built Qt against the system xkbcommon, which 
> explains why the coverage in the 3rdparty xkbcommon is zero.
>
I must check this.
But for both versions we are using the same VM.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20150219/f28e3ad6/attachment.html>


More information about the Development mailing list