[Development] Proposal: Deprecating platforms in Qt 5.6 that don't support lambda

Thiago Macieira thiago.macieira at intel.com
Fri Feb 20 16:55:21 CET 2015

On Friday 20 February 2015 15:24:04 Mark Gaiser wrote:
> I've read about this range-based-for stuff before and there was this paper
> [1] that apparently wants to introduce the next generation of it. It would
> introduce the syntax (WITHOUT auto!):
> for (elem : range)
> Which would be exactly the same as:
> for (auto&& elem : range)
> Now i wonder, even if that paper is accepted, would it solve the issue for
> the Qt containers when that syntax would be used on them?

No, it's just syntactic sugar. No change in effects.
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

More information about the Development mailing list