[Development] A better headersclean test
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
perezmeyer at gmail.com
Tue Jan 6 00:21:59 CET 2015
On Monday 05 January 2015 14:27:20 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Monday 05 January 2015 15:27:24 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> > ACKing that I do not do developer-build for Debian (because "we don't need
> > it" [0]) and that my opinion should not have much weight if any, I do
> > also
> > think Thiago's idea is a nice one. I do also consider having headers clean
> > of warnings is a feature which might help catching bugs earlier.
> >
> > [0] It would actually be really cool if we could, but that would mean to
> > own more build-power and time, which I really don't have.
>
> Developer builds should never be enabled for user packages. If Debian wants
> to do this and help us by reporting build errors and test errors, that's
> fine. But please make sure that users don't get the .debs that may result
> of that unless they explicitly subscribe to such a build.
Yes, don't worry, I was always thinking in searching for bugs and errors, not
user's packages.
--
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20150105/6b5159d2/attachment.sig>
More information about the Development
mailing list