[Development] A better headersclean test

Rutledge Shawn Shawn.Rutledge at theqtcompany.com
Tue Jan 6 07:32:08 CET 2015


On 6 Jan 2015, at 01:06, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira at intel.com> wrote:

> On Monday 05 January 2015 23:15:24 Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
>> Il 02/01/2015 17:55, Thiago Macieira ha scritto:
>>> I'm giving it another week due to the Christmas/New Years break, after
>>> that I will consider it ML consensus to enable by default.
>> 
>> Can we make it opt-in instead of opt-out? I don't see why all Qt
>> developers should pay by default for the extra compilation times (or,
>> modify their configure to add even more options), while this can be
>> easily enforced by CI.
> 
> The current solution I sent to Gerrit is opt-in. The email here was to ask to 
> make it opt-out.
> 
> I am assuming the CI will opt-in for some configs.

For development I usually do debug builds, so it would be nice to avoid the extra build time (and extra nagging during the build) most of the time, and just let CI enforce it, as long as that is reliable.




More information about the Development mailing list