[Development] Upgrading the sources to C++11 keywords (Q_NULLPTR, etc.)

[Giuseppe D'Angelo]

On 9 January 2015 at 22:53, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira at intel.com> wrote:
> On Friday 09 January 2015 22:15:25 Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
>> On 9 January 2015 at 20:19, André Pönitz <apoenitz at t-online.de> wrote:
>> > C++ 'nullptr' only gives a benefit over '0' in the rare cases where it
>> > helps for disambiguation. I would not really like a policy encouraging
>> > 'nullptr' when '0' is just fine, but at least that would be tolerable.
>>
>> Not only that, compilers are starting to complain about 0 used in
>> place of NULL / nullptr, for instance GCC under
>> -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant.
>
> We may have to add that to headersclean, since conceivably our users may want
> to use it. But we don't have to turn it on for our sources.

Doesn't that already mean an awful lot of work? Thinking of how many
places there are with "= 0" when an optional pointer parameter is
expected...

-- 
Giuseppe D'Angelo