[Development] QVector now has rvalue push_back (was: Re: HEADS UP: potential trouble from a recent QVector change)

Gunnar Roth gunnar.roth at gmx.de
Tue Jul 21 20:28:31 CEST 2015


> Am 21.07.2015 um 20:11 schrieb Bubke Marco <Marco.Bubke at theqtcompany.com>:
> 
> 
> Gunnar Roth <gunnar.roth at gmx.de>
>>> 
>>>     void push_back(T &&t) {
>>>         ensureCapacity(size() + 1);
>>>         new (m_end) T(std::move(t));                // move-construct from t
>>>         ++m_end;
>> why is std::move needed here? Afaik std::move(t) converts t into a rvalue ref, but t is already an r-value ref.
> 
> If T would be not a template t is binding to a rvalue reference but it is not itself a rvalue reference but an lvalue.
> If T is a template like in this case it is more complicated because it is a universal or forward reference. For a 
> forward reference it could be an lvalue reference like (T&) or a lvalue(T) depending as the argument is a rvalue,
> lvalue or lvalue reference. 
> T&& -> T
> T& -> T&
> T -> T
> 
> std::forward would be of better use than std::move: 
> http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/utility/forward
> 

Well std::forward is the right thing to do here not std::move ( std::move just does accidentally the same. the forward	is needed because of the way T is deduced from the passed parameter.

Regards,
Gunnar Roth


More information about the Development mailing list