[Development] Replace QtXml backend

Sylvain Pointeau sylvain.pointeau at gmail.com
Fri Jul 31 09:42:51 CEST 2015


On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Gerhard Scheikl <g.scheikl at avibit.com>
wrote:

>
> I found a nice image on stackoverflow:
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9387610/what-xml-parser-should-i-use-in-c
>
> If it is true, then our choice would be xerces because libxml2 doesn't
> have an
> exact DOM/SAX API compliance.
>
>
my opinion is that libxml is the best xml library, it is everywhere and it
is very fast. I used libxml multiple times to parse big files, and this is
just the best library for xml / xslt

I personally don't care so much for the exact DOM/SAX API compliance, and
furthermore this problem disappears because you implement a Qt API on top.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20150731/d737c687/attachment.html>


More information about the Development mailing list