[Development] Some Qt3D feedback

[Marc Mutz]

On Thursday 11 June 2015 13:09:39 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Marc Mutz <marc.mutz at kdab.com> wrote:
> > I was listing namespaces that are used in Qt already. That was to rebut
> > your claim that the use of a namespace for a Qt library is new.
> 
> I didn't make any claim that "the use of a namespace for a Qt library is
> new".
> 
> Whatever you rebutted was not my claim.

I had the following in mind:

On Monday 08 June 2015 01:11:23 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> 5) Qt3D namespace
> 
> This is the first time that all classes in a library are in a namespace. 
> Previously only enums (in various modules) and free functions (in 
> QtConcurrent) have been put in namespaces. 
> 
> In QtConcurrent, the module name also appears in the header file, but that 
> is not followed by Qt3D libraries.
> 
> Given that Qt has never put classes in a namespace like this, is there 
> something to be consistent about here?

Sorry if should I have replied to the wrong mail.

Thanks,
Marc

-- 
Marc Mutz <marc.mutz at kdab.com> | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company
Tel: +49-30-521325470
KDAB - The Qt Experts