[Development] QtCS: Notes from Modern C++ session

[Thiago Macieira]

On Friday 12 June 2015 18:58:59 Marc Mutz wrote:
> On Friday 12 June 2015 16:37:15 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On Friday 12 June 2015 12:12:17 Olivier Goffart wrote:
> > > Which mean using things like std::function, std::unique_ptr, in our ABI.
> > > Should we allow that?
> > 
> > The problem is deciding between std::function and std::__1::function.
> 
> Is __1 now standard? Or just a placeholder for what Clang's libc++ uses?

It's what libc++ uses, which is the real problem. For as long as there are 
systems where you can opt into libstdc++ or libc++, we should avoid hardcoding 
one or the other.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center