[Development] RFD: plugins vs QStringLiterals
thiago.macieira at intel.com
Thu Nov 5 21:50:17 CET 2015
On Thursday 05 November 2015 18:23:37 Robin Burchell wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015, at 06:13 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > > Problem: performance impact, complexity of the atom/quark solution.
> > to lessen the performance impact, we could have a #define to control the
> > construction behavior of QSL at compile time. i'm not quite sure whether
> > to make that opt-in or opt-out (safety vs. performance).
> Is the problem only apparent inside of plugins? Do we have a way to
> detect whether someone is building plugin code at build time? (CONFIG +=
> plugin for qmake, I guess?) If so, couldn't the behaviour of
> QStringLiteral differ for code inside of plugins, to that outside of
Plugins and any library loaded by plugins that hadn't been loaded before.
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
More information about the Development