[Development] Qt 5.5.0 build issues on OS X : rpath
jake.petroules at petroules.com
Tue Sep 29 17:43:19 CEST 2015
> On Sep 29, 2015, at 2:35 AM, Massimo Callegari <massimocallegari at yahoo.it> wrote:
>> From what I can see, nothing is "broken" for him in the sense he is not limited from doing anything >he was previously able to do.
> Again, the matter is simple: what was working from Qt 4.8 up to Qt 5.4.2 is not working anymore with Qt 5.5.x. At least for me.
Because it was previously using a configuration that was extremely uncommon in real world Mac development. Now it's fixed and you are required to adapt your project in accordance.
>>> Since Qt 4.8 and up to Qt 5.4.2 I was using the install_name_tool procedure as described here:
>>> With prebuilt Qt 5.5.x clang64, QtFrameworks don't use absolute paths anymore, but instead they use @rpath, so calling something like this
>>> install_name_tool -change @rpath/QtCore.framework/Versions/5/QtCore
>>> appears not to be working. (and not needed anymore)
>> Do not do that. You *want* the @rpath version; using anything but rpath-based install names on >Apple platforms is an obscure edge case. If you think you need that, you almost certainly don't.
> But it's what Trolltech/Nokia/Digia/QtCompany suggest to do !
> Here again: http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/osx-deployment.html
As I said, the documentation needs to be updated. I'll update it so that it provides more information and better corresponds with what I said earlier.
> Deploying an OSX app is not only packing an application binary + the Qt libraries.
> My project has a plethora of other libraries coming from MacPorts and a number of QtPlugins loaded at runtime.
> So, I HAVE to perform install_name_tool on those ! (until MacPorts decide to go the rpath way as well...which I guess will make a lot of people upset)
That's the "broken dependency" case. Why MacPorts has a no-rpath policy on a platform where you copy the actual libraries into your product, I have no idea. Maybe try Homebrew, they tend to be more up-to-date anyways.
> Anyway, see with your eyes. There are a lot of conditions to build on Qt4, QML, etc, but it should give you the idea of "my use case":
> Start from macx.pro
> If you want to see what's inside my DMGs, download from here:
You can easily have a build setup that works for all Qt versions from 4.8 through 5.5. Simply use install_name_tool to transform dynamic library install names to @rpath-based ones as always (if they are already in the latter form, the commands will do nothing), and add @loader_path/../Frameworks to your own binaries -- simple as that. It'll work with 4.8, 5.4, 5.5...
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules at petroules.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Development