[Development] Proposal for "container-oriented deterministic memory manager"

Simon Hausmann Simon.Hausmann at qt.io
Wed Dec 28 14:36:55 CET 2016


building on the suggestion: do you have any thoughts about how your allocator could be used instead of a garbage collector in an ecmascript implementation?


From: philippeb8 at gmail.com
Sent: December 28, 2016 14:23
To: development at qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] Proposal for "container-oriented deterministic memory manager"

On 12/28/2016 07:52 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Again, I'm not saying we shouldn't improve. We should make QML much better
> than any competition, especially HTML. But your arguments aren't flying and you
> can't point to a paper that objectively proves your claims. Until then, we'll
> take your suggestion into consideration, but it's going to be low priority.

Ok thank you very much.

I'm just trying to help because I think the QtQuickCompiler is a nice
piece of product.

Development mailing list
Development at qt-project.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20161228/6cbc1515/attachment.html>

More information about the Development mailing list