[Development] We are planning to upgrade qdoc to use clang for parsing C++

[Smith Martin]

I'm stating it now. What is your objection?


martin


________________________________
From: Development <development-bounces+martin.smith=theqtcompany.com at qt-project.org> on behalf of Karsten Heimrich <karsten.heimrich at digia.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 12:08 PM
To: development at qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] We are planning to upgrade qdoc to use clang for parsing C++


Hi,



From: Development [mailto:development-bounces+karsten.heimrich=theqtcompany.com at qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Cristian Adam
Sent: Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2016 11:20 Uhr
To: Smith Martin <Martin.Smith at theqtcompany.com>
Cc: development at qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] We are planning to upgrade qdoc to use clang for parsing C++





On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Smith Martin <Martin.Smith at theqtcompany.com<mailto:Martin.Smith at theqtcompany.com>> wrote:

Send ideas for upgrading the Qt documentation to C++11.



1. Which C++11 constructs will be used in Qt?



2. Which of these should appear in the documentation?



Send comments to the CC list.



Since qdoc will be using libclang, any change of getting the same treatment for moc?



I've heard these now several times without finding any reasonable source for the rumor. Can please someone point me to the place where this is stated.



--Karsten
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20160225/56038fca/attachment.html>