[Development] We are planning to upgrade qdoc to use clang for parsing C++

Cristian Adam cristian.adam at gmail.com
Thu Feb 25 17:33:52 CET 2016


On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira at intel.com>
wrote:

> On quinta-feira, 25 de fevereiro de 2016 11:20:16 PST Cristian Adam wrote:
> > Since qdoc will be using libclang, any change of getting the same
> treatment
> > for moc?
>
> I don't think that's a good idea. We can't require people to install Perl
> in
> order to compile Qt. Requiring them to install and build llvm + clang
> (which
> implies now installing cmake too) is too much.
>
>
This might be a burden for some of the Qt developers (Windows ones).

But all the Qt users get a modern / flexible moc, see this thread:
https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/470ama/qt_moc_myths_debunked/d09c90e

Cheers,
Cristian.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20160225/34bb8955/attachment.html>


More information about the Development mailing list