[Development] Question about QCoreApplicationData::*_libpaths

Thiago Macieira thiago.macieira at intel.com
Tue Jan 5 14:41:52 CET 2016

On Tuesday 05 January 2016 15:37:51 Marc Mutz wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 January 2016 12:56:55 Ulf Hermann wrote:
> > avoid paying the price of constructing a QStringList if they are unused.
> That's what I was wondering about: constructing a QStringList is just a copy
> of a pointer, and while not totally free, it is next to nothing compared to
> the additional heap allocation of a new'ed QStringList...

It's still a good enough trade-off, considering we'd need to keep a bool 

> (we need std::optional :)


Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

More information about the Development mailing list